Post by may on Nov 16, 2005 9:27:34 GMT -5
Ok, now I have this idiotic (Cameron may agree with me here) Psych 203 (stats unit) tutor called RUSSEL IAN BRIDLE (Now, why did I put his full name up? Oh, thats why... Maybe he'll read this and KNOW I am talking about him GRR!).
Here are a few examples of what he does:
He gathers us around and talks about what he 'er' thinks 'er' knows 'er' how 'er' to do 'er'. He also constantly jamms his hands in to his pockets... reason? I dunno, I'm a chick!!
Then he gets us to go and complete Exercise 1, Question 1 on the computers and then come back listen to him jabber on then go and complete Exercise 1, Question 2. The whole 3hr session involves about 6 Exercises and about 4-5 questions each. Now you get my point...
He also has this annoying habit of not allowing us tables, formulas, notes, pens or papers FOR Z DISTRIBUTION, ANOVA stats and everything else like that for quizes that are worth 10%!!!!! Yet in Marie's tute she gets to use it all INCLUDING HER TEXT BOOK!!
So heres the story (I'm getting old and longwinded):
I got my lab report back. 6.5/10. Not bad considering I started the 2000 word report at 10pm when it was due the next day at 9am. But then I had a read of the comments...
"ABSTRACT TOO LONG" Abstract was 115 words - its double spaced u idiot!!!
"USE PARTICIPANTS" instead of subjects because humans willingly participate, they are not inhumane gunieu pigs.
"SOMEWHAT HARD TO FOLLOW HERE" "CONFUSING" Just cos I'm AZN!! Think I got Singlish lah? You wrong mah, I show u yah?
"DONT PUT THIS IN METHOD" But Marie put it specifically in her method and even got a TICK for it!
"NO WARNING BEEP" "WHAT BEEP"In Lab book there said there was a beep but in actual lab there was no beep, but since I was an absenteee....
"RESULT FORMAT WRONG" However, I followed the text book religiously and Marie had the same thing which was not noted by her tutor.
So yeah thats it. Should I dispute? There are a few more other crap but I just cant be bothered typing it up (its like a bloody essay!)
Oh and the best bit about my essay:
"Descriptive statistics calculated are showin in Table 1."
Russell's comments
"What table?!"
No table included... smart one, Jamie!
Here are a few examples of what he does:
He gathers us around and talks about what he 'er' thinks 'er' knows 'er' how 'er' to do 'er'. He also constantly jamms his hands in to his pockets... reason? I dunno, I'm a chick!!
Then he gets us to go and complete Exercise 1, Question 1 on the computers and then come back listen to him jabber on then go and complete Exercise 1, Question 2. The whole 3hr session involves about 6 Exercises and about 4-5 questions each. Now you get my point...
He also has this annoying habit of not allowing us tables, formulas, notes, pens or papers FOR Z DISTRIBUTION, ANOVA stats and everything else like that for quizes that are worth 10%!!!!! Yet in Marie's tute she gets to use it all INCLUDING HER TEXT BOOK!!
So heres the story (I'm getting old and longwinded):
I got my lab report back. 6.5/10. Not bad considering I started the 2000 word report at 10pm when it was due the next day at 9am. But then I had a read of the comments...
"ABSTRACT TOO LONG" Abstract was 115 words - its double spaced u idiot!!!
"USE PARTICIPANTS" instead of subjects because humans willingly participate, they are not inhumane gunieu pigs.
"SOMEWHAT HARD TO FOLLOW HERE" "CONFUSING" Just cos I'm AZN!! Think I got Singlish lah? You wrong mah, I show u yah?
"DONT PUT THIS IN METHOD" But Marie put it specifically in her method and even got a TICK for it!
"NO WARNING BEEP" "WHAT BEEP"In Lab book there said there was a beep but in actual lab there was no beep, but since I was an absenteee....
"RESULT FORMAT WRONG" However, I followed the text book religiously and Marie had the same thing which was not noted by her tutor.
So yeah thats it. Should I dispute? There are a few more other crap but I just cant be bothered typing it up (its like a bloody essay!)
Oh and the best bit about my essay:
"Descriptive statistics calculated are showin in Table 1."
Russell's comments
"What table?!"
No table included... smart one, Jamie!
